Tuesday, November 22, 2011
Greens Drainage
Winter drainage, low areas on several putting greens collect water because of poor surface slope and internal drainage. To help water move off and avoid heavy ice build up, sod is removed prior to our first snow fall. The dark channel absorbs the sunlight helping to melt snow and ice when temperatures rise.
Monday, October 31, 2011
Bunker Edging
Late fall is a great time of year to edge bunkers. Grass has stopped growing and every new edge done this fall will be fresh for the spring. By doing late edging the grounds staff is able to concentrate on spring clean-up and ready the course for play.
Tree Root Pruning
On Monday the last day of October the grounds staff is root pruning along side three Crimmson King Maples on the North side of the putting green. Pruning will help reduce drought conditions along the collar an into the putting surface. A 1/8 thick inch plastic barrier is set into place after a trench is cut 18 inches deep.
Tuesday, October 18, 2011
Wet Conditions
After a weekend of rain on October 15th and 16th, the course is slow to dry out. As the grounds staff travels the course they find many wet spots.
Tuesday, October 11, 2011
Tree removal
The Beech tree between #5 and #8 will be removed as well as the Pine tree directly behind the pump house on #14.
Topdressing Tees
Tees are an important part of the course. Topdressing tees with sand helps to firm the surface and dilute the thatch layer. Although we started topdressing tees in late summer we have 3 applications down and are seeing good results.
Friday, August 26, 2011
Tree Roots
When trees are located near tees, its not long before tree roots can play havoc and affect the health of the tee. As the tree gets older many of these roots will get
larger and could certainly hurt someone when taking a swing. This picture was taken of the tree roots on #11 blue tee where there are two large Silver Maples not more than 15 feet from the tee. These trees have been root pruned in the past, but will continue to encroach unless removed.
larger and could certainly hurt someone when taking a swing. This picture was taken of the tree roots on #11 blue tee where there are two large Silver Maples not more than 15 feet from the tee. These trees have been root pruned in the past, but will continue to encroach unless removed.
Greens Aerification
All greens were aerified and topdressed with sand on Monday August 22nd. There are areas on greens that will need additional sand applied to fill in the holes.
This is usually is a two step process and will take three or four days to complete providing the weather cooperates.
Thursday, August 25, 2011
Fairway Aerification
Fairways were aerified on August 22nd using an outside contractor, Andre and Sons from Montrose, Pennsylvania. They arrived with 5 tractors with aerifiers attached. The contractor was able to finish all 18 fairways in a five hour period.
In-house aerification would take one entire day to do just one par four fairway. With the golf schedule, rainy weather and or equipment breakdowns, completing the job is almost impossible using our one fairway aerifier.
This aerification is the first in many years where all fairways were aerified.
Friday, August 5, 2011
Clover
As with most things we do on the golf course, weather plays a huge factor. Often maintenance schedules and cultural programs are postponed, or delayed all together. During April and May Wanakah received several inches of rain making the golf course practically impossible to mow let alone spray for clover. Timely sprays were canceled or put on hold until conditions improved. Once the rains had stopped, the grounds staff was busy finishing work on the new improvements made last fall to holes 1, 2, 4, 5 and 9.
As Labor Day arrives, temperatures will start to cool and conditions will again favor the control of clover. Fall is the ideal time of year to control broad leaf weeds. Applications of fertilizer will be applied, helping to improve density in the turf stand and crowding out the clover.
As Labor Day arrives, temperatures will start to cool and conditions will again favor the control of clover. Fall is the ideal time of year to control broad leaf weeds. Applications of fertilizer will be applied, helping to improve density in the turf stand and crowding out the clover.
Tuesday, August 2, 2011
Turfgrass Disease
As temperatures and humidity rise, turfgrass diseases can become a serious problem, Anthracnose is one of these warm season diseases. This disease can cause major turf loss and is slow to recover. In the above picture, Basal Rot Anthracnose is prevalent.. This disease is caused by poor drainage, low height of cut, low levels of nitrogen and a compacted soil profile. Poa annua is most susceptable.
Wednesday, July 27, 2011
Native Areas
Native Areas
Last year the grounds committee in consultation with the Board and in conjunction with the Master Plan decided to develop several areas of the golf course that are generally not in play by allowing native grasses to grow naturally.
This was done for several reasons.
First, allowing these areas to grow naturally means we don’t have to use limited resources (both financial and physical) maintaining areas that are generally out of play. It also lessens the amount of chemicals we use. Additionally it promotes the wildlife that inhabits these areas.
These native areas also provide definition to the holes that they border giving perspective where previously there was none.
We realize not every feature of the golf course will please everyone. Beauty is in the eye of the beholder and where one looks for it. And these decisions were not made in a vacuum. They were meant for the betterment of our golf club and enjoyment for all.
It would be nice if these changes were viewed with that understanding rather than backbiting and causing controversy for all.
Tuesday, July 19, 2011
Friday, July 8, 2011
Green Speed
Can you name at least ten things that affect the speed and consistency of the greens? How about 20?
1. Mowing frequency
2. Height of cut
3. Rolling
4. Green size
5. Drainage
6. Moisture
7. Shade
8. Air flow
9. Environmental stress
10. Growth regulators
11. Annual bluegrass seed heads
12. Fertilizer
13. Labor force size
14. Labor force training
15. Budget
16. Soil type
17. Turf species
18. Thatch layer thickness
19. Golf event calendar / schedule
20. Maintenance procedures like; aerifying, topdressing, verti-cutting, venting, hydrojecting, etc.
1. Mowing frequency
2. Height of cut
3. Rolling
4. Green size
5. Drainage
6. Moisture
7. Shade
8. Air flow
9. Environmental stress
10. Growth regulators
11. Annual bluegrass seed heads
12. Fertilizer
13. Labor force size
14. Labor force training
15. Budget
16. Soil type
17. Turf species
18. Thatch layer thickness
19. Golf event calendar / schedule
20. Maintenance procedures like; aerifying, topdressing, verti-cutting, venting, hydrojecting, etc.
Tuesday, July 5, 2011
Deep Tine Aerification
Aerifying fairways using solid tines, fractures the soil allowing for water and air to infiltrate the soil profile. Compacted soils play havoc when trying to grow healthy turfgrass. I've found aerifying in late June, early July the soil is much harder to penetrate, the sod will lift as the tines are coming out of the ground. The lifted sod will need rolled down and watered for proper healing. With good weather deeptine fairway aerification takes approximately 1 week to complete.
Thursday, June 30, 2011
Sewer Repairs
The grounds staff is repairing four breaks in the shop's sewer line. These breaks were caused by last falls construction on holes # 4 and # 5.
Wednesday, June 22, 2011
Watering New Sod
Since Eagle Golf has finished laying nearly forty two thousand square of sod on reshaped and graded areas on holes 4 and 5, the grounds staff has been kept busy hand watering sod. Without rain newly laid sod needs to be watered daily and nursed until a good root structure takes place. Watering will be especially important as we enter the months of July and August.
Thursday, June 9, 2011
Saturday, June 4, 2011
New Construction
On Saturday June 4th, Eagle Golf has started to work on the three new tees on 9, then will focus on the new fairway bunker on 5, new tee on 1 and finished the mound behind 4 tee. Sod will be placed on most areas including the tee decks. Estimated time to complete is four to five days.
Weather permitting!
Weather permitting!
Tuesday, May 31, 2011
Slow Greens
Rainy weather has played havoc with green speeds. Proper conditioning for good putting surfaces comes from several factors, able to cut the greens daily, topdress greens weekly with sand, lower your height of cut, keep water off and have good interior drainage. Number 5 green has some scalping in the back center do to the greens being soft. For example greens #13 and #18 had no water in the cups after couple days of rain, these two greens had drainage installed last fall.
Monday, May 30, 2011
Wanakah Golf Course Blog
It's time to Blog!
I'm starting a golf course blog to keep the members better informed on what's happening on the course. It's an in depth look on what the grounds staff does regarding maintenance practices and techniques. It will also highlight architectural improvements to the course, explaining why and what were doing.
I'm starting a golf course blog to keep the members better informed on what's happening on the course. It's an in depth look on what the grounds staff does regarding maintenance practices and techniques. It will also highlight architectural improvements to the course, explaining why and what were doing.
New Bunkers
New bunkers on holes 1-2-4 and 5 will be soft until settling and compacting of the sand is complete. This will be finished in the next several days, bunker firmness will be enhanced with time.
The bunker sand comes from the Best Sand Company, Chardon Ohio, it' their top sand for bunkers and is called (Signature) sand.
There's a lot to learn about the sand you select for your course.
by James Francis Moore WITH THE possible exception of green speed, sand bunkers are the most controversial and discussed features on golf courses, regardless of the golfer's ability. Predictably, opinions vary widely on issues such as design, location, playing quality of the sand, and even what color is best. Generally, there are four major areas that must be considered when evaluating bunkers. These are sand selection, architecture, construction, and maintenance.
Selecting the proper sand for bunkers is arguably the most difficult of these four areas. The makeup of the sand strongly impacts maintenance and playing quality. The sand can also influence the architecture and style of construction of bunkers.
There are seven factors that should be considered when selecting the sand.
Particle Size
As a general guideline, a sand used in bunkers should be composed of particles with a large majority in the range of 0.25-1.00mm. Silt and clay (particles below 0.05mm) should be kept to a minimum, since they are associated with surface crusting. Note that this size range should be utilized only as a first step in determining whether the sand is likely to be acceptable overall. In other words, it is unlikely that a sand that falls significantly outside this range will perform well in terms of crusting, hardness, porosity, and/or playing quality. On the other hand, it would be a mistake to assume that a sand will be appropriate for bunker use simply because it falls within this particle size range. For example, depending on particle shape, some sands that fall in this range would be considered too firm or too soft for play. Since particle size screening is a simple, inexpensive test that is performed by most sand suppliers, it is the best first step in determining if the sand is worthy of further testing.
When evaluating the particle size range of the sand for bunker use, keep in mind that bunker sand often ends up on the green in surprisingly large quantities. As golfers blast their way free of the hazard, the sand is thrown onto the adjacent green. Therefore, when selecting sand for use in greenside bunkers, the makeup of the green's rootzone must also be considered. The best rule of thumb is to avoid using a sand in the green-side bunkers that is significantly finer in gradation than that used in the rootzone of the green. This is the same basic rule used for selecting greens topdressing materials. You can safely lay a coarser material over a finer rootzone mix without creating significant drainage problems, but just a few topdressings with a finer material over a more coarsely graded rootzone can cause drainage problems.
If a bunker sand is selected that is significantly finer in gradation than the rootzone mixture used in the greens, additional aerification should be practiced on the affected areas of the green. Backfilling the aerifier holes with a more coarsely graded sand helps mover water more rapidly into the rootzone.
Material that is too coarse also can create problems. Particles greater than 2.00mm are classified as gravel. If present in large quantities, particles in this range damage mowing equipment and cause the ball to deflect off line.
Particle Shape and Penetrometer Value
The shape of the sand particles has a strong influence on playing quality and maintenance. A sand particle's shape is classified by examining both the relative sharpness of the particle's edges and the overall shape of the particle itself. The surface of particles can range from very angular (many sharp, well-defined edges) to well rounded (smooth surfaces). The shape of the particle can range from low sphericity (an elongated particle) to high sphericity (a particle that is nearly round).
Table 1 - Potential for Fried-Egg Lies Thomas Turf Services
The angularity and sphericity of the particles have a strong influence on the playing quality of the sand. For example, a low-sphericity, very angular sand generally has high resistance to fried-egg lies. Such sands also tend to stay in place better on the face of the bunker. However, this same sand would produce very firm bunkers that some players may find objectionable. Well-rounded, high-sphericity sands can produce fried-egg lies and are more likely to move off the bunker face during maintenance and irrigation rainfall.
Sands usually consist of a mixture of particle shapes and sizes. This is important to the stability and playing quality of the sand. Again, as a general rule, sands that are highly uniform in size range and shape (particularly if rounded with high sphericity) tend to be less stable than a sand that has a wider range of particle dimensions.
Determining a sand's angularity and sphericity is helpful in predicting the ultimate playing quality of a bunker, but is by no means an exact science. The USGA currently is funding research to attempt to develop better measurement techniques to aid in the selection of sands for rootzone mixtures and bunkers.
The angularity of the sand is determined by examining the particles with a microscope and comparing them to the chart in Figure 1 -- Angularity and Sphericity of Sand Particles. After measuring the angularity, the laboratory performs the penetrometer test to determine the sand's tendency to produce fried-egg lies. The penetrometer measures the sand's resistance to compression. The values are reported in kg/cm2. The potential for fried-egg lies is based on penetrometer values as described in Table 1 -- Potential for Fried-Egg Lies (Thomas Turf Services).
Crusting Potential
Crusting is the formation of a layer of dried, stiff sand on the surface of the bunker. Such layers typically are 1/8 to 1/4 inch in thickness, and they severely decrease the playing quality of the bunker. Sands that are prone to crusting require more frequent raking to maintain good playing quality. If the crusting potential is high, the bunkers will require raking following each irrigation and rainfall event. This greatly increases the labor required to keep the bunkers in good condition.
Crusting is directly related to the percentage of silt and clay in the sand. As silt and clay increase, the severity of crusting increases as well. To test for crusting potential, the laboratory wets a thin layer of sand and allows it to dry overnight. They then attempt to lift the layer on the edges using a spatula. Whether or not a crust has formed will be recorded on the lab test results and is usually reported as N (none), L (light), M (moderate), or S (severe).
Chemical Reaction and Hardness
Some laboratories also test the sand for its chemical reaction (pH). This value is much less important overall than the other test results and, on its own, should not be used to disqualify a sand being considered for use. The pH value provides insight into the chemical makeup of the sand. A sand with an extremely high pH (> 8.0) is likely to be strongly calcareous and therefore subject to physical and chemical weathering.
Sand particles also can change in shape and size due to mechanical wear. Sand particles that are very soft can be crushed into smaller particles during raking. A soft sand may play and drain perfectly at first, only to degrade in quality as the particles are broken down. Some laboratories now perform a hardness test to determine the likelihood of this type of degradation.
Infiltration Rate
Infiltration rate refers to the sand's ability to drain. It is also referred to by laboratories as saturated hydraulic conductivity. This measurement is most relevant to rootzone mixes for use in putting greens, but it is also used by some labs to evaluate bunker sands.
Since straight sand is used in bunkers, the initial infiltration rate measurement is likely to be very high -- often in excess of 50 inches per hour. As a general guideline, a sand being considered for use in bunkers should drain at a minimum rate of 20 inches per hour.
Infiltration rate measurements are more useful when evaluating the suitability of a sand that has been in the bunker for some time. In most cases, the sand in the bunker gradually becomes contaminated with the soil from the base and sides of the bunker. This process occurs more rapidly in bunkers with steep faces and in areas subject to heavy, frequent rains. A sand that has become heavily contaminated with soil and organic debris will drain much more slowly than a sand that is clean. Simply installing new or additional drainage pipe would be only partially effective under such circumstances. Complete removal and replacement of the contaminated sand may be the only complete solution.
Color
Unfortunately, bunker sands occasionally are selected based primarily on their color. Although sand color is important, since it strongly impacts the appearance of the course, it should not be given greater consideration than particle size, particle shape, or crusting potential.
Laboratories measure the color of sand by comparing it to the Munsell Color Chart. As a general rule, lighter-colored sands are preferred since they contrast beautifully with the green grass. Color measurements are also useful when evaluating the visual compatibility of two sands. An annual task on many courses is to add an inch or two of sand to existing bunkers to replace what is lost from explosion-type shots and water and wind erosion. If the new sand is a markedly different color from the existing sand, it can take months of raking for the two sands to blend into a uniform color.
Overall Playing Quality
Without question, playing quality is the most subjective evaluation of bunker sands. Players vary widely in their assessment of what constitutes good playing quality. One of the few shared opinions seems to be a desire for all the bunkers on the course to play in a consistent manner. For this reason, when adding sand to existing bunkers it is a good practice to perform the work on all of the bunkers on the course.
From a testing standpoint, particle size, particle shape, crusting potential, and infiltration rate all provide insight as to how the sand will play. However, other factors that have nothing to do with the makeup of the sand have equal if not greater impact on playing quality. The other factors include:
The green-side irrigation system almost always overlaps into the bunkers. Thus, during times of the year when it is necessary to water the greens frequently, the sand in the bunkers will be wetter. And, since the irrigation system is designed to apply water as evenly as possible to the surface of the green rather than the surrounding areas, it is likely the bunkers adjacent to the green will receive varying amounts of water.
The depth of the sand usually varies even within the same bunker. The sand is almost always deeper on the low, flat portion of the bunker and shallower on the faces and slopes. It would be a mistake to attempt to maintain a consistent depth throughout the bunker. Golfers should gauge the depth and firmness of the sand while taking their stance and adjust their shot accordingly.
Sands often change significantly in their playing quality over the first few months as they become compacted and contaminated with soil and organic debris. Newly installed sand may seem soft at first, but soon will become more firm. The speed at which this firming occurs depends on the angularity and particle sizing of the sand, as well as raking practices. Since most bunkers are subject to at least some erosion during irrigation and heavy rainfall events, the sand will gradually become contaminated with the underlying and surrounding soil. As a result, the playing quality of the bunker gradually changes as the bunker ages. The sand particles can also change in size and shape due to mechanical weathering, as discussed earlier.
Determining which sand yields the best playing quality is such a subjective process that a test bunker is often constructed to allow golfers to field-test the sands for themselves. Assuming three sands are being considered (each of which has already been evaluated by an accredited physical soil testing laboratory), use 2 ´ 6's to divide the test bunker into three areas. Evaluate the sands for a period of at least two to three months to allow the sand to compact and better simulate what will happen on the course. Unfortunately, while this testing process will demonstrate the playing quality of each prospective sand, it cannot guarantee a unified opinion among the golfers. The USGA currently is funding research to better predict the playing characteristics of sands through laboratory testing.
Several soil testing laboratories provide bunker sand evaluation services. Usually, a complete analysis can be obtained for less than $200. The laboratory will need a gallon of dry sand to perform all of the tests. Be sure to submit a sample of each sand that is being considered. Allow at least two to three weeks for the laboratory to complete the tests.
Conclusion
Clearly, there is more to selecting the right sand for your bunkers than calling the local sand plant and ordering a few truckloads. Today's golfers (at least in the United States) are becoming increasingly more demanding of bunkers that play consistently, drain rapidly, and provide additional beauty to the course. One of the most important pieces of advice this article can offer is to remember that time is a necessary component to achieve these goals. Allow plenty of time for testing to narrow your choices to sands that are properly sized, stable, and easier to maintain. Time also is needed for the construction and use of a test bunker to allow golfers to evaluate the different sands for playing quality. Finally, time will be required for the newly installed sand to firm up and take on its final playing characteristics.
JIM MOORE joined the USGA Green Section in 1985, spending his time conducting Turf Advisory Service visits in the Mid-Continent Region. In 1996, he assumed the duties of director of the newly formed Construction Education Program.
Green Section Record Jan/Feb 1998 Vol. 36, #1
The bunker sand comes from the Best Sand Company, Chardon Ohio, it' their top sand for bunkers and is called (Signature) sand.
How to Select the Best Sand for Your Bunkers
There's a lot to learn about the sand you select for your course.
by James Francis Moore WITH THE possible exception of green speed, sand bunkers are the most controversial and discussed features on golf courses, regardless of the golfer's ability. Predictably, opinions vary widely on issues such as design, location, playing quality of the sand, and even what color is best. Generally, there are four major areas that must be considered when evaluating bunkers. These are sand selection, architecture, construction, and maintenance.
Selecting the proper sand for bunkers is arguably the most difficult of these four areas. The makeup of the sand strongly impacts maintenance and playing quality. The sand can also influence the architecture and style of construction of bunkers.
There are seven factors that should be considered when selecting the sand.
- Particle size
- Particle shape and penetrometer value
- Crusting potential
- Chemical reaction (pH) and hardness
- Infiltration rate
- Color
- Overall playing quality
Particle Size
As a general guideline, a sand used in bunkers should be composed of particles with a large majority in the range of 0.25-1.00mm. Silt and clay (particles below 0.05mm) should be kept to a minimum, since they are associated with surface crusting. Note that this size range should be utilized only as a first step in determining whether the sand is likely to be acceptable overall. In other words, it is unlikely that a sand that falls significantly outside this range will perform well in terms of crusting, hardness, porosity, and/or playing quality. On the other hand, it would be a mistake to assume that a sand will be appropriate for bunker use simply because it falls within this particle size range. For example, depending on particle shape, some sands that fall in this range would be considered too firm or too soft for play. Since particle size screening is a simple, inexpensive test that is performed by most sand suppliers, it is the best first step in determining if the sand is worthy of further testing.
When evaluating the particle size range of the sand for bunker use, keep in mind that bunker sand often ends up on the green in surprisingly large quantities. As golfers blast their way free of the hazard, the sand is thrown onto the adjacent green. Therefore, when selecting sand for use in greenside bunkers, the makeup of the green's rootzone must also be considered. The best rule of thumb is to avoid using a sand in the green-side bunkers that is significantly finer in gradation than that used in the rootzone of the green. This is the same basic rule used for selecting greens topdressing materials. You can safely lay a coarser material over a finer rootzone mix without creating significant drainage problems, but just a few topdressings with a finer material over a more coarsely graded rootzone can cause drainage problems.
If a bunker sand is selected that is significantly finer in gradation than the rootzone mixture used in the greens, additional aerification should be practiced on the affected areas of the green. Backfilling the aerifier holes with a more coarsely graded sand helps mover water more rapidly into the rootzone.
Material that is too coarse also can create problems. Particles greater than 2.00mm are classified as gravel. If present in large quantities, particles in this range damage mowing equipment and cause the ball to deflect off line.
Particle Shape and Penetrometer Value
The shape of the sand particles has a strong influence on playing quality and maintenance. A sand particle's shape is classified by examining both the relative sharpness of the particle's edges and the overall shape of the particle itself. The surface of particles can range from very angular (many sharp, well-defined edges) to well rounded (smooth surfaces). The shape of the particle can range from low sphericity (an elongated particle) to high sphericity (a particle that is nearly round).
Table 1 - Potential for Fried-Egg Lies Thomas Turf Services
Penetrometer Reading | Fried-Egg Potential |
Greater than 2.4 kg/cm2 | Very Low tendency to bury |
2.2 to 2.4 kg/cm2 | Slight tendency to bury |
1.8 to 2.2 kg/cm2 | Moderate tendency to bury |
Less than 1.8 kg/cm2 | High tendency to bury |
The angularity and sphericity of the particles have a strong influence on the playing quality of the sand. For example, a low-sphericity, very angular sand generally has high resistance to fried-egg lies. Such sands also tend to stay in place better on the face of the bunker. However, this same sand would produce very firm bunkers that some players may find objectionable. Well-rounded, high-sphericity sands can produce fried-egg lies and are more likely to move off the bunker face during maintenance and irrigation rainfall.
Sands usually consist of a mixture of particle shapes and sizes. This is important to the stability and playing quality of the sand. Again, as a general rule, sands that are highly uniform in size range and shape (particularly if rounded with high sphericity) tend to be less stable than a sand that has a wider range of particle dimensions.
Determining a sand's angularity and sphericity is helpful in predicting the ultimate playing quality of a bunker, but is by no means an exact science. The USGA currently is funding research to attempt to develop better measurement techniques to aid in the selection of sands for rootzone mixtures and bunkers.
The angularity of the sand is determined by examining the particles with a microscope and comparing them to the chart in Figure 1 -- Angularity and Sphericity of Sand Particles. After measuring the angularity, the laboratory performs the penetrometer test to determine the sand's tendency to produce fried-egg lies. The penetrometer measures the sand's resistance to compression. The values are reported in kg/cm2. The potential for fried-egg lies is based on penetrometer values as described in Table 1 -- Potential for Fried-Egg Lies (Thomas Turf Services).
Crusting Potential
Crusting is the formation of a layer of dried, stiff sand on the surface of the bunker. Such layers typically are 1/8 to 1/4 inch in thickness, and they severely decrease the playing quality of the bunker. Sands that are prone to crusting require more frequent raking to maintain good playing quality. If the crusting potential is high, the bunkers will require raking following each irrigation and rainfall event. This greatly increases the labor required to keep the bunkers in good condition.
Crusting is directly related to the percentage of silt and clay in the sand. As silt and clay increase, the severity of crusting increases as well. To test for crusting potential, the laboratory wets a thin layer of sand and allows it to dry overnight. They then attempt to lift the layer on the edges using a spatula. Whether or not a crust has formed will be recorded on the lab test results and is usually reported as N (none), L (light), M (moderate), or S (severe).
Chemical Reaction and Hardness
Some laboratories also test the sand for its chemical reaction (pH). This value is much less important overall than the other test results and, on its own, should not be used to disqualify a sand being considered for use. The pH value provides insight into the chemical makeup of the sand. A sand with an extremely high pH (> 8.0) is likely to be strongly calcareous and therefore subject to physical and chemical weathering.
Sand particles also can change in shape and size due to mechanical wear. Sand particles that are very soft can be crushed into smaller particles during raking. A soft sand may play and drain perfectly at first, only to degrade in quality as the particles are broken down. Some laboratories now perform a hardness test to determine the likelihood of this type of degradation.
Infiltration Rate
Infiltration rate refers to the sand's ability to drain. It is also referred to by laboratories as saturated hydraulic conductivity. This measurement is most relevant to rootzone mixes for use in putting greens, but it is also used by some labs to evaluate bunker sands.
Since straight sand is used in bunkers, the initial infiltration rate measurement is likely to be very high -- often in excess of 50 inches per hour. As a general guideline, a sand being considered for use in bunkers should drain at a minimum rate of 20 inches per hour.
Infiltration rate measurements are more useful when evaluating the suitability of a sand that has been in the bunker for some time. In most cases, the sand in the bunker gradually becomes contaminated with the soil from the base and sides of the bunker. This process occurs more rapidly in bunkers with steep faces and in areas subject to heavy, frequent rains. A sand that has become heavily contaminated with soil and organic debris will drain much more slowly than a sand that is clean. Simply installing new or additional drainage pipe would be only partially effective under such circumstances. Complete removal and replacement of the contaminated sand may be the only complete solution.
Color
Unfortunately, bunker sands occasionally are selected based primarily on their color. Although sand color is important, since it strongly impacts the appearance of the course, it should not be given greater consideration than particle size, particle shape, or crusting potential.
Laboratories measure the color of sand by comparing it to the Munsell Color Chart. As a general rule, lighter-colored sands are preferred since they contrast beautifully with the green grass. Color measurements are also useful when evaluating the visual compatibility of two sands. An annual task on many courses is to add an inch or two of sand to existing bunkers to replace what is lost from explosion-type shots and water and wind erosion. If the new sand is a markedly different color from the existing sand, it can take months of raking for the two sands to blend into a uniform color.
Overall Playing Quality
From a testing standpoint, particle size, particle shape, crusting potential, and infiltration rate all provide insight as to how the sand will play. However, other factors that have nothing to do with the makeup of the sand have equal if not greater impact on playing quality. The other factors include:
- Raking frequency
- Raking method
- Green-side irrigation coverage
- Depth of the sand
- Length of time the sand has been in the bunker
The green-side irrigation system almost always overlaps into the bunkers. Thus, during times of the year when it is necessary to water the greens frequently, the sand in the bunkers will be wetter. And, since the irrigation system is designed to apply water as evenly as possible to the surface of the green rather than the surrounding areas, it is likely the bunkers adjacent to the green will receive varying amounts of water.
The depth of the sand usually varies even within the same bunker. The sand is almost always deeper on the low, flat portion of the bunker and shallower on the faces and slopes. It would be a mistake to attempt to maintain a consistent depth throughout the bunker. Golfers should gauge the depth and firmness of the sand while taking their stance and adjust their shot accordingly.
Sands often change significantly in their playing quality over the first few months as they become compacted and contaminated with soil and organic debris. Newly installed sand may seem soft at first, but soon will become more firm. The speed at which this firming occurs depends on the angularity and particle sizing of the sand, as well as raking practices. Since most bunkers are subject to at least some erosion during irrigation and heavy rainfall events, the sand will gradually become contaminated with the underlying and surrounding soil. As a result, the playing quality of the bunker gradually changes as the bunker ages. The sand particles can also change in size and shape due to mechanical weathering, as discussed earlier.
Determining which sand yields the best playing quality is such a subjective process that a test bunker is often constructed to allow golfers to field-test the sands for themselves. Assuming three sands are being considered (each of which has already been evaluated by an accredited physical soil testing laboratory), use 2 ´ 6's to divide the test bunker into three areas. Evaluate the sands for a period of at least two to three months to allow the sand to compact and better simulate what will happen on the course. Unfortunately, while this testing process will demonstrate the playing quality of each prospective sand, it cannot guarantee a unified opinion among the golfers. The USGA currently is funding research to better predict the playing characteristics of sands through laboratory testing.
Several soil testing laboratories provide bunker sand evaluation services. Usually, a complete analysis can be obtained for less than $200. The laboratory will need a gallon of dry sand to perform all of the tests. Be sure to submit a sample of each sand that is being considered. Allow at least two to three weeks for the laboratory to complete the tests.
Conclusion
Clearly, there is more to selecting the right sand for your bunkers than calling the local sand plant and ordering a few truckloads. Today's golfers (at least in the United States) are becoming increasingly more demanding of bunkers that play consistently, drain rapidly, and provide additional beauty to the course. One of the most important pieces of advice this article can offer is to remember that time is a necessary component to achieve these goals. Allow plenty of time for testing to narrow your choices to sands that are properly sized, stable, and easier to maintain. Time also is needed for the construction and use of a test bunker to allow golfers to evaluate the different sands for playing quality. Finally, time will be required for the newly installed sand to firm up and take on its final playing characteristics.
JIM MOORE joined the USGA Green Section in 1985, spending his time conducting Turf Advisory Service visits in the Mid-Continent Region. In 1996, he assumed the duties of director of the newly formed Construction Education Program.
Green Section Record Jan/Feb 1998 Vol. 36, #1
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)